Mutual Assent, Valid Offer & Capacity
Can you please explain these three terms for me?
Perspective and terminology
·
Our perspective for the following
descriptions
·
Will be that of the owner, sponsor or
performing organization
·
Since these are not necessarily all
the same
·
We will use the all-encompassing term
·
"Acquirer"
·
I.e. the one who initiates the
contracting process
·
Similarly
·
We will refer to the respondent as
·
"Supplier"
·
Whether of goods, services, or both
Mutual assent
·
The principle of mutual assent means
that
·
An offer by a supplier to an acquirer
·
Represents a proposal to enter into a
contract
·
With that acquirer
·
Such an offer is typically, though
not necessarily
·
In response to a request for proposal
·
Or request for tender
·
From the acquirer
A valid offer
·
A valid offer generally has several
basic elements
1. There must be genuine intent to contract
2. It must be communicated to the acquirer
3. It must be certain and definitive in its terms and conditions
·
And, as we said earlier
4. Both parties must be free of duress one from
another
·
I.e. the contract can be entered into
voluntarily
·
If these conditions are not met
·
All or part of the contract may be
invalid
Lawful objective
·
Hardly surprising
·
A contract whose purpose violates the
prevailing law
·
I.e. involves unlawful activity
·
Is legally void and unenforceable
·
Not only that
·
But the perpetrators who attempt it
·
Could well end up in jail!
Capacity to perform
·
Both acquirer and supplier
·
Must have the legal capacity to
perform
·
I.e. clearly capable of performing
their respective roles and responsibilities
·
However
·
It may be difficult to prove the
contrary in practice
·
And the actions, or inactions of the
project director or project manager
·
Can have a profound influence on the
contractual relationships
·
And hence affect the effort, progress
and cost of the work of the contract