Project Cost Management & the Project
Life Span
How does project cost management vary
with the project life span, and why?
First the Project Life Span (PLS)
As we have seen in Issacon #1012 &
1033-1035
·
Every
well-managed project progresses through a number of distinct phases
·
Each phase
results in more detailed information
·
About the
project's scope, quality and timing
·
Like the
other project management functions we discuss
·
The evolution
of cost management similarly tracks the project life span
·
This
evolution is discussed in the following pages
Concept Phase - 1
In the Concept Phase
·
Information
about the project is sketchy
·
In outline
only
·
Probably just
key parameters
·
Sufficient
for preparing a Business Case
·
Two estimates
are required
·
Estimate #1:
For the cost of Project Execution
·
Estimate #2:
For the cost of conducting the next phase of Project Definition
Concept Phase - 2
·
Purpose
of estimates 1 & 2
·
Estimate #1
determines whether the project is viable
·
And possibly
its ranking in a program portfolio
·
This estimate
is often referred to as
·
"An Order of
Magnitude"
·
Its range is
typically -25% to +75%
·
Estimate #2
supports budget approval for the next phase
·
PCM in
this phase
·
Costs are
collected as "expenses" and
·
Either saved
for application against the project
·
Or, covered
by operational funding
Definition Phase - 1
In the Definition Phase
·
Information
is gathered from the stakeholders
·
The project
scope is progressively refined
·
Through
feasibility and other studies
·
An interim
Estimate of Project Execution may be prepared
·
Some times
referred to as a "Feasibility Estimate"
·
Its range is
typically -15% to +25%
Definition Phase - 2
·
The
purpose of the Feasibility Estimate
·
Is to ensure
the project is still viable
·
And
competitive in its portfolio ranking
·
Once all
the studies are complete
·
Including all
the project planning
·
The next
level estimate is prepared
·
Often
referred to as "Appropriation Estimate"
·
It supports
the budget request
·
Included in
the Project Charter funding application
Definition Phase - 3
PCM in this phase
·
Is conducted
on two levels
·
Level 1:
Actual costs collected for the current phase work
·
And tracked
against this phase's budget
·
Like a
project in its own right
·
Level 2:
Periodic updates of the Feasibility estimate
·
Up to the
time of arriving at an Appropriation estimate
Execution Phase - 1
In the Execution
Phase
·
The objective
is to contain actual costs within the approved project budget
·
For the
agreed project scope
·
Or obtain
approval for a budget adjustment
·
If the
project scope is revised
If this phase
includes a Design stage
·
Intermediate
estimates should be prepared
·
Often
referred to as
·
Design Review
Estimates
·
With
progressively tighter ranges
Execution Phase - 2
PCM in an Execution Design stage
·
Is also
conducted on two levels
·
Level 1:
Actual costs collected for the current stage work
·
And tracked
against this stage's budget
·
Level 2:
Periodic updates of the estimate for production work
·
Up to the
time of arriving at a "Pre-tender estimate"
·
If the work
is to be done under contract
·
Or,
pre-project production work
·
If the work
is being done internally
Execution Phase - 3
PCM during project Execution/Production
·
Since this is
when major costs are incurred
·
PCM must be
rigorous
·
The objective
is to contain actual costs within the approved project budget
·
By regularly
estimating the cost of the remaining work
·
Based on the
latest productivity data
·
And making
management changes
·
If the final
total exceeds the total budget
Execution Phase - 4
Cost tracking of scope changes
·
If scope
changes are called for
·
Requests for
changes to the budget must be processed
·
So that a
proper "basis for comparison" is maintained
Finishing Phase - 1
In general
·
The
objectives are similar to the previous phase or stage
·
And PCM
follows the same processes
·
However, PCM
is often more difficult
·
As optimism
gives way to realism!
Finishing Phase - 2
In particular
·
Alarm bells
must be sounded
·
When serious
overruns are encountered
·
It is often
better to cut the project off
·
At the 99.9%
completion point
·
And deal with
the outstanding issues under a different financial arrangement